65

65 is Predator meets Jurassic Park but without the innovation, charm, or the unrelenting scares.
53/1002576
Starring
Adam Driver, Ariana Greenblatt
Directors
Scott Beck, Bryan Woods
Rating
PG-13
Genre
Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Release date
March 10, 2023
Overall Score
Rating Overview
Plot/Story
Visuals/Cinematography
Performance
Direction
Non-Wokeness
Rating Summary
The outrageous premise of 65 had me hoping that it would be something special. Why not? You’ve got Adam Driver, laser guns, and dinosaurs. What’s not to like? Unfortunately, what we got was a generic monster movie with few scares, a lot of quiet introspection, and far too much time to catch our breath.
Audience Woke Score (Vote)
Please wait...

65 million years ago, mankind had already been traversing the cosmos for millennia, while Earth was a distant and unexplored planet that no one had ever heard of. 65 asks the question, what if our spacefaring progenitors crashed landed there and had laser guns to fend off dinosaurs while they tried to find a way off planet before the meteor that killed all of the dinosaurs crashed and killed everyone? Sounds like a lot of fun, doesn’t it? It’s not.

65

Adam Driver plays Mills, a space pilot whose work often takes him away from home for extended periods, leaving behind his wife and their ailing daughter. While piloting a craft full of cryogenically frozen people, his ship encounters an uncharted asteroid field, is struck, and crashlands on a prehistoric Earth. Now, he and the only other survivor of the crash, 9-year-old Koa, played by 15-year-old Ariana Greenblatt, have to survive the Cretaceous Period long enough to locate the wreckage of his craft and hope that the escape vessel within is still intact.

slide 1
1 Vacation
2 Shop
3 Amazon

65 is a movie that seems like it’s ashamed to be what it is, a monster movie with a fun premise. It should deliver pulse pounding thrills and scares while taking the audience on an adventure that moves its protagonists from point A to point B before the clock runs out…or they get eaten.

While it does deliver one or two decent scares, it never fully commits. Instead, it tries too hard to be an introspective piece about a broken man who finds a way to let go of his pain and love again…in between shooting T-Rexes in the face with a laser rifle.

Unfortuneatly, the two don’t mesh well, and 65 suffers for it. Had there been more survivors that got winnowed away as the movie went on, perhaps it would have raised the stakes. Had they not waited until midway into the film to let the audience know what was going on emotionally with Mills, maybe we could have identified with him earlier and gone on the emotional ride with him. Had the writers forgone any of the needless subplots, perhaps the film would have been a much tighter and more focused thriller. Regrettably, none of that happened.

What did happen is that a guy who cannot miss a shot with his rifle that never runs out of ammo, and who can shake off deep abdominal wounds and dislocated shoulders, travels across some dangerous terrain with a girl whose language he doesn’t understand and can’t, therefore, communicate with.

The stakes never feel that high, the action never feels that exciting, and the premise is never fully realized.

WOKE ELEMENTS

What few co-stars the movie offers all check off Hollywood’s intersectional quota boxes.

GET NOTIFIED!

Latest Reviews

Choose to receive our updates weekly or monthly.

Look for your confirmation email

SELECT EMAIL FREQUENCY

Look for your confirmation email

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply

GET NOTIFIED!

Latest Reviews

We'll email you a heads-up when we publish our latest reviews.

Look for your confirmation email

SELECT EMAIL FREQUENCY

Look for your confirmation email

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply

James Carrick

James Carrick is a passionate film enthusiast with a degree in theater and philosophy. James approaches dramatic criticism from a philosophic foundation grounded in aesthetics and ethics, offering insight and analysis that reveals layers of cinematic narrative with a touch of irreverence and a dash of snark.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

 

 

 

GET NOTIFIED!

Latest Reviews

We'll email you a heads-up when we publish our latest reviews.

Look for your confirmation email

SELECT EMAIL FREQUENCY

Look for your confirmation email

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply