Homosexual relationships are not the same as heterosexual. Also, this is a film aimed squarely at children. I think we can agree to keep adult topics like sex away from kids entertainment. A married couple, mother and father, is still the best and the norm as it has been for eons.

Drew, not getting married in a children’s movie IS A WOKE TENNANT. Why do we have to celebrate not being married in front of little children? It’s the opposite of what traditional storytelling and culture stands for. Hence….woke.

If you feel that Wade is allowed to be written as a testosteroneless character, perhaps that may be fine but since it exists inside a movie with so many other woke elements, we have to assume it is contrived by design to fit the woke narrative. (it also doesn’t help that an indordinate amount of the disney and marvel themes in the past several years have intentionally installed characters and plots with wokeness. If Disney creative executives put on record how they hope that 50% of all characters be LGBTQ, (see the video of the exec saying it) I’m going to trust that if Ember is alpha and hetero, to satisfy Disney’s stated objective, Wade by simple math must be the oppositie. Hence…woke.

And Drew…Disney stated the movie is about race / cultural relations (looking past people’s differences). Horse’s mouth.

One last thing Drew….It is so unbelievable old and tired that people who are affluent must be made fun of and insulted by derogatory dialogue IN A CHILDREN’S MOVIE. That’s programming little children to dislike perceived “rich people” as bad which implies to children that as long as you’re not rich, you’re virtuous.

How bout this…BE SUCCESSFUL LITTLE CHILDREN AND YOU TOO CAN LIVE IN AN AWESOME PLACE AND ENJOY THE COMFORTS OF YOUR HARD WORK…THAT’S THE AMERICAN WAY! sooooo….Drew…..again WOKE.

It’s a kid’s movie, not a 2 hour grooming session.

Please read the context of the review…the context of these reviews are about the authenticity of the story and characters and plots and the review clearly lays out how there are so many “elements” in the film that are unnecessary, over political messages that are shoving a political agenda and narrative down people’s throats. Whether the viewer feels the love story is beautiful, the review is about how this love story fits into love stories in film in general, and also how it fits within traditional love stories. The male lead in this film is not charismatic at all…there’s nothing assertive about him at all…he’s the type that is the best friend (or gay best friend) to the girl…he’s a nice guy, but that’s it. And….there’s no point in having so many gay couples around subtly in a little children’s movie. Period. Lastly, the reviewer is correct. Doesn’t it get old watching children’s movies and having an absolutely worn out overused metaphor serve as the plot again and again? YES!

That should read, “bully of other men.” If you’re going to be the grammar police, try not to screw up your own post. 🙄

Too many typos and butchering of the English language. Take a basic English class, study Strunk and White, and stop being such a bully if other men. Calling people losers and beta males says more about you than it does about them.

dude you guys think a movie is bad for portraying a couple living together… “unmarried”. Jfc grow up.

Don’t you have some books to burn and U.S. flags to replace with Trump flags?