About Us

The growing disparity between what audiences think about a program and that of the “professionals” has finally increased to the point that it can no longer be ignored. So, we have decided that our religious conservative voice needs to be heard, and so we bring you Worth it or Woke.

Everyone is biased, but we wear ours out in the open for all to see, so much so that we’ve built it right into our critique model. Right alongside what we think about the story, performances, and visuals, we let you know if the woke quotient (woketient) is distractingly high, tolerable, or not there at all.

The Woke-O-Meter is a graphic representation of how much a film, series, or video game is affected by the radical progressivism (if any) present in it.

The higher the score, the less woke it is (e.g. 90% Based is 10% Woke), and vice versa (e.g. 10% Based is 90% Woke).

We recognize that not everyone has the same tolerance for radical progressivism, nor does everyone perceive wokeness in exactly the same way. Since our mission is to provide the best possible information and not marching orders, in addition to the more subjective Woke-O-Meter, we include a list of every possible element of wokeness that we find in every program and game. This way, even if viewers don’t agree with the percentage of wokeness we’ve assigned to the program, they still have everything they need to make an informed decision.

Woke [wōk]: adj.– 1. having a propensity for ultra/radical-progressivism, characterized by the active eschewing of objective truth, traditions, and societal mores that have been tried and tested for generations in lieu of nonsensical beliefs that defy logic and substantive supportive objective data. Ex: Roads are racist is a woke concept.

Based [bāst]: adj.– 1. abbreviated slang for “based in fact.” The opposite of “woke.”  2. courageous, unique, or not caring what others think. It’s especially common in online political slang. The opposite of “cringe.”

Examples of Wokeness in film

• The forced celebration of behavior that, until 30 minutes ago, was deemed to be immoral, unethical, or the province of the profoundly mentally disturbed, and treating those who do not participate in said celebration as bigots.
• Writing women as snarky prats who are better and smarter than every male in the film because every male in the program has been written as either a useless and/or evil caricature of a man.
• Disney’s “not so secret gay agenda.”
• Retconning strong male characters in their own sequels and reboots to be significantly lesser than previously established so that a “strong independent woman” can undermine them.
• The purposeful misrepresentation of religion and the religious and/or capitalism and capitalists so that it/they may be used as straw men to forward a false (i.e. radical-progressive) narrative.
• Manufactured diversity quotas for the sake of diversity over narrative.

Questions? Please contact us at [email protected]